| |
|
|
|
|
|
Forum
Please
Log In
to post a new message or reply to an existing one. If you are not registered, please
register.
NOTE: Some forums may be read-only if you are not currently subscribed to
our technical support services.
|
Subject |
Author |
Date |
|
|
Dominik Braendlin
|
Dec 19, 2008 - 5:35 AM
|
I just downloaded v2.84 and I came across the following error: ’error C2065: ’CX_BORDER’ : undeclared identifier’. I am using VS 2008 with the latest SP and patches. In the file \Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\atlmfc\src\mfc\afximpl.h I found. // Note: afxData.cxBorder and afxData.cyBorder aren’t used anymore #define AFX_CX_BORDER 1 #define AFX_CY_BORDER 1 but no CX_BORDER
|
|
|
Krustys Donuts
|
Jan 27, 2009 - 7:45 PM
|
Seems like there is a bug in void CExtSplitterBaseWnd::DrawAllSplitBars( CDC* pDC, int cxInside, int cyInside )... for( int row = 0; row < m_nRows; row++)
{
int cy = m_pRowInfo[row].nCurSize + 2*m_cyBorder;
if( row == m_nRows-1 && m_bHasHScroll)
cy += afxData.cyHScroll - __EXT_MFC_CX_BORDER;
OnDrawSplitter( pDC, splitBorder, CRect( x, y, x+cx, y+cy ) );
y += cy + m_cySplitterGap - 2*m_cyBorder;
} In this case shouldn’t the __EXT_MFC_CX_BORDER be replaced with __EXT_MFC_CY_BORDER?
|
|
|
Technical Support
|
Jan 28, 2009 - 11:44 AM
|
Yes, there are several usages of the CX_BORDER and CY_BORDER constants in Prof-UIS 2.84 and they should be replaced with __EXT_MFC_CX_BORDER and __EXT_MFC_CY_BORDER. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
|
|
|
Krustys Donuts
|
Jan 28, 2009 - 11:50 AM
|
I know that... that’s not what I was asking. I’m saying that I think one of the __EXT_MFC_CX_BORDERs should be replaced with a __EXT_MFC_CY_BORDER? Please see the code snippet I included above. Should we make this change?
|
|
|
Technical Support
|
Jan 28, 2009 - 12:27 PM
|
Yes, you are right, the following: cy += afxData.cyHScroll - __EXT_MFC_CX_BORDER;
should be replaced with: cy += afxData.cyHScroll - __EXT_MFC_CY_BORDER;
|
|
|
Dominik Braendlin
|
Dec 19, 2008 - 7:22 AM
|
Thank you for the answer. I have already changed the code as you have suggested. Although I prefer not to modify a library. Instead I hope that FOSS will fix this issue in a next release
|
|
|
Paul Cowan
|
Dec 19, 2008 - 7:16 AM
|
The problem is in ExtSplitterWnd, you need to use __EXT_MFC_CX_BORDER and __EXT_MFC_CY_BORDER instead of the older, CX_BORDER and CY_BORDER. I though Foss had changed the source and fixed this a while ago, guess not.
|
|
|
Technical Support
|
Dec 19, 2008 - 11:20 AM
|
We confirm this issue. Prof-UIS 2.84 uses __EXT_MFC_CX_BORDER instead of CX_BORDER and __EXT_MFC_CY_BORDER instead of CY_BORDER. There are few places in 2.84 source code where CX_BORDER and CY_BORDER were not replaces with __EXT_MFC_CX_BORDER and __EXT_MFC_CY_BORDER. We are sorry for the inconvenience.
|
|